We had 14,000 active contracts in a SharePoint folder. DocParse extracted clause-by-clause data in 36 hours. Renewal-risk dashboards live by week 2.
Every clause.Mapped and machine-readable.
MSAs, NDAs, leases, employment agreements. DocParse extracts parties, terms, obligations, renewal triggers, and risk flags into structured data.
{
"counterparty": "Northwind Logistics",
"term_months": 36,
"auto_renew": true,
"renewal_term_months": 12,
"notice_days": 60,
"liability_cap": "12_months_fees",
"governing_law": "Delaware"
}Three reasons teams switch to us
Clause-level extraction
120+ clause types out of the box: indemnity, liability cap, IP assignment, exclusivity, MFN, audit rights. Add your own.
Risk flags, not just data
Surfaces unusual terms — uncapped liability, perpetual licenses, governing-law mismatches — before they hit your inbox.
Renewal alerts on autopilot
Wires renewal dates and notice deadlines into your calendar so nothing auto-renews you didn't intend.
From raw contracts
to structured data, in four steps.
Starter schema for contracts.
Tweakable in seconds.
The contracts template comes with a 10-field starter schema based on the most common fields teams pull from contracts. Add your own fields, mark which are required, and change types in the dashboard or via the REST API.
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"title": "Contracts",
"type": "object",
"required": [
"counterparty",
"effective_date",
"term_months",
"auto_renew"
],
"properties": {
"counterparty": {
"type": "string"
},
"effective_date": {
"type": "string"
},
"term_months": {
"type": "integer"
},
"auto_renew": {
"type": "boolean"
},
"notice_days": {
"type": "integer"
},
"governing_law": {
"type": "string"
},
"liability_cap": {
"type": "string"
},
"indemnity": {
"type": "object"
},
"ip_assignment": {
"type": "string"
},
"risk_flags": {
"type": "array"
}
}
}Field-level accuracy per field.
Multi-modal models do the reading, and accuracy depends on document quality. The numbers below are illustrative ranges we've seen on contracts — run your own documents and compare against a small ground-truth set before you scale.
accuracy ceiling
One endpoint.
Every output you need.
# Extract with one POST
curl -X POST "https://api.docparse.io/v1/contracts" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $DOCPARSE_KEY" \
-F file=@"msa-acme-northwind.pdf" \
-F schema="msa" \
-F webhook="https://api.acme.co/incoming"
# Returns:
{
"status": "complete",
"confidence": 0.987,
"latency_ms": 2412,
"data": { ... }
}Plain HTTP, no SDK lock-in
Bearer-token auth with revocable, SHA-256-hashed API keys. Call it from any language that can hit a REST endpoint — we publish docs and copy-pasteable snippets, not opinionated wrappers.
Signed webhooks for async
Register an endpoint, set the events, and we POST signed deliveries (HMAC-SHA256, Standard Webhooks spec) as extractions finish. Every attempt is logged in the dashboard with response code, body, and timing.
Why teams switch from regex.
A look at how DocParse compares to the three things you've probably already tried.
Reach the tools you already run.
DocParse ships two integration surfaces directly — REST API and signed webhooks — plus a native Zapier app that opens up everything else.
How teams use DocParse for contracts.
Illustrative scenarios drawn from teams piloting DocParse — names and figures are examples, not customer quotes.
It found three contracts with uncapped liability we had completely forgotten about. The product paid for itself before we finished the rollout.
Kira was $200k a year and required a 6-month rollout. DocParse cost a fifth of that and we had production output the same afternoon.
The questions teams ask before they sign up.
Know what is in your contracts.
Map every clause across thousands of agreements. Surface risk, renewals, and obligations before they bite.