We were paying a BPO 11 cents per invoice. Switched to DocParse, dropped to under 4 cents, and the line-item accuracy actually went up.
Every invoice.Instantly structured.
Vendor, line items, taxes, totals, currency. DocParse reads invoices in any layout, any language — and returns the fields your AP system already speaks.
{
"vendor": "Acme Supply Co.",
"invoice_no": "INV-20294",
"issue_date": "2026-04-14",
"due_date": "2026-05-14",
"subtotal": 1712.50,
"tax": 130.00,
"total": 1842.50,
"currency": "USD"
}Three reasons teams switch to us
Reads any layout, any language
No template setup. We process invoices from 180+ countries in 60 languages on the first run.
Line items, not just headers
Every row, SKU, quantity, unit price, tax rate. Even when the invoice is rotated, low-res, or stapled to a packing slip.
Three-way match, automated
Wires invoices to POs and goods receipts so your AP team only sees exceptions. Saves a full FTE at 20k invoices / month.
From raw invoices
to structured data, in four steps.
Starter schema for invoices.
Tweakable in seconds.
The invoices template comes with a 10-field starter schema based on the most common fields teams pull from invoices. Add your own fields, mark which are required, and change types in the dashboard or via the REST API.
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"title": "Invoices",
"type": "object",
"required": [
"vendor",
"invoice_no",
"issue_date",
"subtotal",
"total",
"currency",
"line_items"
],
"properties": {
"vendor": {
"type": "string"
},
"invoice_no": {
"type": "string"
},
"issue_date": {
"type": "string"
},
"due_date": {
"type": "string"
},
"subtotal": {
"type": "number"
},
"tax": {
"type": "number"
},
"total": {
"type": "number"
},
"currency": {
"type": "string"
},
"line_items": {
"type": "array"
},
"po_number": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}Field-level accuracy per field.
Multi-modal models do the reading, and accuracy depends on document quality. The numbers below are illustrative ranges we've seen on invoices — run your own documents and compare against a small ground-truth set before you scale.
accuracy ceiling
One endpoint.
Every output you need.
# Extract with one POST
curl -X POST "https://api.docparse.io/v1/invoices" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $DOCPARSE_KEY" \
-F file=@"invoice-acme-20294.pdf" \
-F schema="invoice" \
-F webhook="https://api.acme.co/incoming"
# Returns:
{
"status": "complete",
"confidence": 0.987,
"latency_ms": 2412,
"data": { ... }
}Plain HTTP, no SDK lock-in
Bearer-token auth with revocable, SHA-256-hashed API keys. Call it from any language that can hit a REST endpoint — we publish docs and copy-pasteable snippets, not opinionated wrappers.
Signed webhooks for async
Register an endpoint, set the events, and we POST signed deliveries (HMAC-SHA256, Standard Webhooks spec) as extractions finish. Every attempt is logged in the dashboard with response code, body, and timing.
Why teams switch from regex.
A look at how DocParse compares to the three things you've probably already tried.
Reach the tools you already run.
DocParse ships two integration surfaces directly — REST API and signed webhooks — plus a native Zapier app that opens up everything else.
How teams use DocParse for invoices.
Illustrative scenarios drawn from teams piloting DocParse — names and figures are examples, not customer quotes.
Our biggest fear was edge-case vendors with weird PDFs. DocParse handled all of them on day one. Two-week pilot, ten-minute integration.
The webhook-to-NetSuite pipeline meant our AP team stopped touching invoices entirely except for exceptions. We hired one fewer person.
The questions teams ask before they sign up.
Stop keying invoices.
Live in ten minutes. Free for your first hundred invoices. NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Sage all wired in.